지뇽뇽 님의 포스팅(http://jinpark.egloos.com/1248022)을 보다가 아주 흥미 있는 리플 하나를 발견하고 당장 구글신께 경배. 결과는
Journal of Negative Results ( http://www.jnr-eeb.org )
The primary intention of Journal of Negative Results is to provide an online-medium to publish peer-reviewed, sound scientific work in ecology and evolutionary biology that is scientifically rigorous but does not rely upon arbitrary significance thresholds to support conclusions. In recent years, the trend has been to publish only studies with 'significant' results and to ignore studies that seem uneventful. This may lead to a biased, perhaps untrue, representation of what exists in nature. By counter-balancing such selective reporting, JNR aims to expand the capacity for formulating generalizations. The work to be published in JNR will include studies that 1) test novel or established hypotheses/theories that yield negative or dissenting results, or 2) replicate work published previously (in either cognate or different systems). Short notes on studies in which the data are biologically interesting but lack statistical power are also welcome. JNR also intends to present the results of studies in a format suitable for formal meta-analysis. Research quality is of highest importance for JNR. Manuscripts will be assessed for publication on this basis - positive results or support for current scientific dogma are not essential.
The primary intention of Journal of Negative Results is to provide an online-medium to publish peer-reviewed, sound scientific work in ecology and evolutionary biology that is scientifically rigorous but does not rely upon arbitrary significance thresholds to support conclusions. In recent years, the trend has been to publish only studies with 'significant' results and to ignore studies that seem uneventful. This may lead to a biased, perhaps untrue, representation of what exists in nature. By counter-balancing such selective reporting, JNR aims to expand the capacity for formulating generalizations. The work to be published in JNR will include studies that 1) test novel or established hypotheses/theories that yield negative or dissenting results, or 2) replicate work published previously (in either cognate or different systems). Short notes on studies in which the data are biologically interesting but lack statistical power are also welcome. JNR also intends to present the results of studies in a format suitable for formal meta-analysis. Research quality is of highest importance for JNR. Manuscripts will be assessed for publication on this basis - positive results or support for current scientific dogma are not essential.
- 'to do science is to search for repeated patterns' (MacArthur, 1972)
이유가 과학적으로 지극히 건전하다
연구원들 논문실적 올려주기가 아니라. '안 불건전'한 모습
연구원들 논문실적 올려주기가 아니라. '안 불건전'한 모습
그런데 지뇽뇽님이나 kidsmoke님 말씀처럼 여기에 실리기가 오히려 더 어려울 수 있다는 점이 재미있다. '논리를 제대로 갖추고 실패만 해야' 하니까.
결론 ] 뭐가 됐건 Journal에 논문 싣기는 어렵다. peer-review를 하는 제대로 된 논문이라면 말이다.
漁夫
덧글